<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To be rich or to be true</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cattsfashions.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/to-be-rich-or-to-be-true/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cattsfashions.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/to-be-rich-or-to-be-true/</link>
	<description>Showcasing Second Life fashions designed by Cattrina Careless</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 06:52:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Second Style Fashionista &#187; Not slutty = No sales?</title>
		<link>http://cattsfashions.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/to-be-rich-or-to-be-true/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Second Style Fashionista &#187; Not slutty = No sales?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cattsfashions.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/to-be-rich-or-to-be-true/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] The other day Ciera Bergman of Vitamin Ci wrote a provocative post on her blog, which got me (and at least one other person) thinking. Do Second Life designers have to sell sex in order to sell clothes? Ciera writes, I remember when I first started Vitamin Ci&#8230;it was to cater to those people. The people who wanted more clothes on than not&#8230;Sure, the quality of my designs have gotten better, but my skirts have gotten shorter, tops skimpier, and pants as low as they can go. Why? Because I started to cater to the bigger crowd, [instead of] the crowd my line was intended for. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The other day Ciera Bergman of Vitamin Ci wrote a provocative post on her blog, which got me (and at least one other person) thinking. Do Second Life designers have to sell sex in order to sell clothes? Ciera writes, I remember when I first started Vitamin Ci&#8230;it was to cater to those people. The people who wanted more clothes on than not&#8230;Sure, the quality of my designs have gotten better, but my skirts have gotten shorter, tops skimpier, and pants as low as they can go. Why? Because I started to cater to the bigger crowd, [instead of] the crowd my line was intended for. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
